top of page

Volume 2  Issue 5

Picture4.png

“Contracting Strategies for Non-contracted Healthcare Payers”

Non-contracted payer plans are those plans sold to members and employers that provide the “appearance” of health insurance benefits, and as a result, they incorrectly assume these non-contracted health plans provide in-network (INN) benefits.

 

Here are some examples of non-contracted plans:

 

  • Reference Based Pricing (RBP) - Payers pay % above Medicare (typically pays 50% of participating (PAR) payers).

  • Practitioner Only or Practitioner & Ancillary - Covers professional claims, but there is ZERO hospital payment.

  • Limited Benefit - Most have near ZERO facility payment.

  • Minimum Essential Coverage - Basically preventive visits, ZERO coverage for facilities.

  • No Inpatient Coverage - There is no coverage, so ZERO payment.

  • Sharing Plans - ID cards identify the plan is not insurance, and typically pays 50% of PAR payers.

  • Reasonable & Allowable - Whatever the payer determines is appropriate, which typically pays 50% of PAR payers.

  • Fixed Indemnity - Some pay $100 per day for hospital stays (essentially ZERO payment).

  • Discount Only - Provide “discount” of the network to the member with ZERO payment from insurance.

For reference, here is a copy of member ID card for a non-contracted health plan:

Picture1.png

Though many providers are INN or PAR with MultiPlan, they are likely OON with health plans like this one that clearly states, “Discount networks provided through AWA and are not health insurance.”

 

There are other plans, but these are some of the most widely used out-of-network (OON) payer plans, and it is clear to see why these plans are beneficial to payers. Many of these products are sold without full disclosure, and many times, member ID cards are similar to those offered by “legitimate” payers that do offer covered health benefits.

 

Hospitals write off the losses since fighting the individual claims is cost-exorbitant, which is a glaring offense since hospitals provide courtesy billing to patients. Payers, then, mail patients Explanation of Benefits (EOBs), like the one seen below, misrepresenting hospitals as overcharging and incorrectly stating to the patient they are not responsible for the differences

Picture2.png

To avoid the trap often set by some health plans, here are a few tips to review member ID cards to determine coverage status:

 

If the answer to any of the following questions is “NON-PAR,” there is no need to proceed unless the patient will agree to remitting payment for OON costs., except for emergency care.

  1. Is payer listed with provider as NON-PAR or OON with health plan?

  2. Is there a reference to Medicare payment, discount, or “NOT Insurance” on the back of the ID card?

  1. Is there a medical network logo on the member ID card?

Another example is Blue Cross Blue Shield—Out of State. Without “travel benefits,” there may be ZERO payment (Exchange and HMO plans).

 

If an insurance card does not have a “PPO in a suitcase” logo, the member may only have emergency care coverage. Even with the PPO logo, a member may not be covered or may be subject to significant out-of-pocket expenses if the member has a narrow or tiered network benefit plan.

 

As a rule of thumb, BlueCard members should always verify provider PAR status directly with their home Blues plan.

Picture3.png

Here are some operational strategies to address some of the issues that providers are experiencing with these types of health plans:

 

  • Treat non-emergent patients who have the aforementioned health plans as NON-PAR.

  • Discontinue courtesy billing for these NON-PAR plans.

  • Train patient registration teams to identify NON-PAR ID cards.

  • Add Flags to Epic or any other system you may use (from group #’s) to help identify these plans.

  • Include key players/departments (revenue cycle, patient registration, legal, compliance) in making necessary operational changes to avoid non-contracted payer traps.

 

Reference-based pricing (RBP) plans continue to experience high growth, however, some large employers who utilize RBP are switching from RBP due to patient registration pushback regarding NON-PAR coverage concerns. As well, some third-party administrators and payers are removing providers from RBP and transitioning them to contracted rates. Fortunately, as complaints are directed to Payer Relations departments, the education of local brokers about RBP amongst providers is yielding some success.

 

FLuidity Writing Services partners with healthcare organizations to build new payer platforms and to enhance others by negotiating effective professional and hospital-based (facility) contracts to ensure organizations are yielding the highest profit ratio for their size and services.

 

If you find the information in this article helpful, this is just the start. We have established relationships with healthcare organizations in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, and South Dakota. Contact us to join our team, where our platform meets your needs.

Picture5.png
bottom of page